Filson x Blundstone Limited Edition Boots: First Look
- Matt Zefi
- Nov 5, 2025
- 6 min read
Filson and Blundstone did a collab. Two of my favorite brands, and honestly I wasn't expecting to like these boots as much as I do.
Upfront so there's no confusion: this is a first look, not a long-term review. These arrived, I got them out of the box, I put them on, and I couldn't get them back in the box. I haven't put real miles on them yet.
What I can give you is what they are, how they differ from a standard Blundstone, where they fit in the lineup based on the pairs I've already reviewed, and who should chase down a pair.
Some links below are affiliate links, at no extra cost to you.
Filson x Blundstone: the details
Spec | Detail |
Colorway I got | Teak, waxed nubuck leather |
Other option | Sienna suede |
Price | Around $240 |
Where I bought | Directly from the Blundstone website, on release day |
Availability | Limited edition. Sizes were nearly or completely sold out quickly |
Midsole | XRD shock-absorbing technology |
Made in | Imported. Not USA, not Australia |
Branding | Filson logo on the front, Blundstone logo on the back |
Interior | Fully orange |
Pull tabs | Leather, unlike standard Blundstones |
Why this collab makes sense
Both are iconic brands in their own right. Filson's heritage traces back to the Klondike Gold Rush out of Alaska. Blundstone is an Australian institution well over a hundred years old.
I've been wearing Blundstones nearly every day for the last couple of months, including some pretty extreme hikes, so I can speak to how comfortable they are. They're easily my favorite boots. These are going to take that spot.
I'd been hunting for a brown pair for a while, and then out of nowhere this collab was announced. I think these came out better than what I was actually looking for.
What's different from a standard Blundstone
The details are where you can feel Filson's influence:
Leather pull tabs, a departure from Blundstone's usual
A fully orange interior, which you don't see coming
Waxed nubuck in the teak colorway
XRD midsole technology, which absorbs a lot of shock force and makes these look built to handle terrain
Dual branding, Filson on the front and Blundstone on the back
The fit is basically identical to my other Blundstones, which is to say it's very good.
Where these sit in the Blundstone lineup
I've spent a lot of time in this lineup, so here's the honest positioning.
The 587, from the 500 Series, is the versatile one. Sleek enough for casual or semi-formal wear, durable enough for moderate outdoor use, and light. Its traditional sole gives solid traction for hiking and everyday wear, but it doesn't match a lug sole in genuinely rough conditions.
The Lug Boot goes the other direction. Heavy-duty construction, deeper lugs for real grip on rough or slippery ground, extra cushioning and a raised sole. The tradeoff is bulk and weight, which makes it less appealing for all-day city wear and a bit oversized in town.
There's also Blundstone's all-terrain sole, which is the honest middle ground if you want more traction without the Lug's bulk.
This collab reads as a heritage-leaning boot with real shock absorption. With the XRD midsole and waxed nubuck, it's aimed at someone who wants the everyday Chelsea profile but expects to take it off pavement. If you need maximum traction on wet rock, the Lug is still the specialist.
For the full breakdown, I compared those two directly in Blundstone 587 vs Lug Boots.
Sizing and fit
Both of the models I've reviewed keep the classic Blundstone fit: snug, with enough room for flexibility. This collab is no different, and it fits the same as my other pairs.
If you already know your Blundstone size, order it and don't overthink this.
Teak nubuck vs Sienna suede: which colorway?
I went teak, and I'd make that choice again.
I already own suede Chelsea boots, and I wear them almost exclusively for fancy occasions, which really means I barely wear them. Suede is much harder to care for and it gets dirty immediately, so you end up not wanting to wear it. That defeats the point.
Waxed nubuck is the practical pick if you actually intend to use these.
Are these hiking boots?
Not officially. But I've hiked in Blundstones more times than I can count.
The appeal of a Chelsea boot is that there's nothing to lace. You can be out the door and on a trail in seconds, like a cowboy boot. That's a real advantage, and it's a large part of why these get worn instead of admired.
They've got that brand-new feel right now that makes you want to baby them, and I get it. But the whole point of Blundstones is that they're durable and they gain character with age. Keeping them pristine is boring and it misses what these boots are for.
I'd call them a city-to-trail boot. Forest, or a date night, they'll do the job either way. Chelsea boots read a little more upscale than most boots that can take that kind of abuse.
The imported question
They're imported, not made in the USA or Australia.
I'll be consistent here, because I raised the same point about the Filson Tin Cloth Work Jacket: when you're paying a premium price for a heritage brand, country of origin is a fair thing to weigh. It didn't stop me buying either one, and both are well made. But if "made in USA" is your deciding factor, know this before you order.
Should you buy the Filson x Blundstone boots?
If you can still find your size, and you already know you like how Blundstones fit, this is an easy yes. It's the nicest brown Blundstone I've seen.
The honest caveats: they're limited edition, and sizes were selling out the week they launched, so availability is the real barrier rather than the decision. And they're imported at a $240 price point.
FAQ
How much are the Filson x Blundstone boots?
Around $240, sold directly through Blundstone.
Do they fit the same as regular Blundstones?
Yes. Same classic Blundstone fit, snug with room for flexibility. Order your usual size.
Are they made in Australia?
No. They're imported, not made in Australia or the USA.
Teak or Sienna suede?
Teak waxed nubuck if you're going to wear them hard. Suede is harder to maintain and gets dirty fast, which means you'll wear it less.
How do these compare to the Blundstone 587 or the Lug Boot?
The 587 is the light, versatile, city-friendly one. The Lug is the heavy-duty traction specialist. This collab sits closer to an everyday Chelsea with an XRD midsole for shock absorption, so it's built for going off pavement without the Lug's bulk.
Can you hike in Blundstones?
They aren't marketed as hiking boots, but I've done plenty of hiking in mine. The slip-on design means you're out the door fast.
Are they still available?
They were a limited run and sizes went quickly. Check the link, but be prepared for gaps.
Final thoughts
I didn't expect to like these as much as I do, and I've barely worn them. I'll report back once they've got real mileage and some character on them.
What do you think of this collab? Would you want to see more special editions like it, or are you more of a Filson person than a Blundstone person? Let me know in the comments. I'll see you out there on the road.
Related:
The rest of my gear
Everything else I use on the road. These are affiliate links, so buying through them supports the channel at no extra cost to you.
Comments